I selectively watch Wang Ju's programs; everyone has their own judgment on whether his views are correct. I watch the same news events from Lao Wang, San Ren, and Wang Ju, and then think and analyze who among them makes more sense, ultimately determining whether it can become my own nourishment—70% fate, 30% luck.
For someone who has long been shackled by thoughts, the real purpose of watching these big-name programs is to avoid biased listening and gradually restore independent thinking ability. However, I suspect that long-term self-castration has caused irreversible brain damage. The most obvious aspect is that I find everyone’s arguments reasonable but cannot form my own reasoning; my brain remains in a passive state of receiving signals, with very weak active thinking and analytical abilities.
Today, Wang Ju's Twitter account was permanently frozen; what articles are involved, I do not know. I still hope for multi-faceted analysis and explanation of various news events. Each Up has its own merits in their perspective, which might be a way to exercise and repair brain nerves.
Finding evidence for Wang Ju's external propaganda is more exciting than reading a detective novel, as it requires finding clues from others' articulated viewpoints, which engages various brain nerves and exercises the brain's information retrieval, filtering, and analytical processing abilities.
Why does everyone say he is bad? What exactly is bad about him? Others can quickly discern loyalty or treachery at a glance; why can't I see it? What is wrong with my brain?
For most people inside the wall, having long been immersed in a domesticated flow of data, they are completely unaware that besides spicy chicken feet, there are also flavors like pepper, spicy, and Thai! Although they are chicken feet, the preparation methods are different.
I may not agree with your views, but I defend your right to speak. I have no good or bad feelings towards Wang Ju; what I value is his ability to express a news event clearly and logically, which is worth learning. As for whether his views carry ulterior motives, you must first discern that yourself. If you only hear others say he is bad and cannot judge for yourself, then thinking he is bad is no different from being foolish.
A friend of mine once mentioned the "White Paper Movement" while drinking. I said I supported them on WeChat, and almost had my account banned. He said it was just a group of university students who had read too much and were causing trouble.
We are still friends, but no longer close. If my mind had remained in that "tomorrow will be better" state inside the wall, I wouldn't think so much; I might just receive the signal that "a small group of university students are causing trouble," but I know the truth is not so simple.
Therefore, I believe it is crucial to keep various channels of information open. I lean towards the viewpoint recommended by Xiao Cui in Wang Zhi'an: Leaving the Team, Revealing His True Colors - YouTube, suggesting that Wang Ju, after leaving the team, appears somewhat isolated and makes sensational statements to gain traffic, trying to take a sidelong approach with his perspectives. In the pursuit of objectivity, he seems to be rushing.
However, I firmly believe that the freedom to express personal opinions is a fundamental right for anyone who yearns for freedom. If the democratic world wants to silence someone just like inside the wall, then what is the difference between inside and outside the wall? Did I go through so much trouble to climb over the wall just to switch from hating one thing to hating another?